If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.
You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.
Interventionism is suddenly all the rage with the Westminster Conservative government, and higher education is feeling the impact as new policies and legislation are brought to bear on the sector, writes Johnny Rich, Chief Executive of Push and of the Engineering Professors’ Council.
Mike Boxall, an independent researcher and consultant on higher education policies and strategies, and a senior adviser to PA Consulting, considers the emerging post-COVID world and its implications for the future of universities. His blog is based on a paper published recently by PA Consulting, and co-authored with its HE lead, Ian Matthias.
The Westminster government should wake up to the full potential of higher education to help it meet its ‘levelling up’ goals, argues Professor Martin Jones, Deputy Vice-Chancellor at Staffordshire University.
The Office for Students is leaving it up to universities to decide on particular approaches to the Coronavirus pandemic rather than issuing specific guidance, and has promised to minimise its regulatory demands on the sector in response to the crisis.
In an update letter to universities on COVID-19, the regulator said institutions should undertake their own local approach and that as long as they have clear reasons for their actions, it is “unlikely to draw negative conclusions”.
The OfS also indicated that universities are no longer required to report the number of individuals with either suspected or confirmed symptoms. The F3 Notice issued earlier this month which asked providers to supply such details has been revised until further notice.
In the letter, Susan Lapworth, the director of competition and registration, said that the key objectives of the OfS in responding to the impact of Covid-19 are to protect students by working with providers to maintain teaching quality and standards, enable adequate exams and assessment, and support financial sustainability.
The regulator promised to minimise its regulatory demands, provide clarity about its requirements during this time and minimise uncertainty through advice and clear communications.
More details about what this means in practice will be issued over the next week. New and current consultations have been paused.
The OfS decision to “not set out particular approaches that providers should adopt” is based on an understanding that being able to respond to local context is vital.
“In practice, this means that we are unlikely to draw negative conclusions about the actions a provider has taken – or not taken – where it is clear to us that it has properly considered the needs of its students and has made a reasonable decision,” the letter said. “For significant decisions, this could mean recording the reasons for the decision clearly. Governing bodies and leadership teams will need to make good judgements about the actions necessary to protect the interests of students and, in particular, to ensure that students have effective pastoral support.”
OfS staff will be made available to answer questions and provide information.
Any questions about the issues in the letter should be emailed to email@example.com.
Questions relating to regulatory matters should be emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org. The regulation helpline is 0117 931 7305 (9am to 5pm Monday to Friday).
© 2013 Media FHE, all rights reserved