If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.
You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.
Interventionism is suddenly all the rage with the Westminster Conservative government, and higher education is feeling the impact as new policies and legislation are brought to bear on the sector, writes Johnny Rich, Chief Executive of Push and of the Engineering Professors’ Council.
Mike Boxall, an independent researcher and consultant on higher education policies and strategies, and a senior adviser to PA Consulting, considers the emerging post-COVID world and its implications for the future of universities. His blog is based on a paper published recently by PA Consulting, and co-authored with its HE lead, Ian Matthias.
The Westminster government should wake up to the full potential of higher education to help it meet its ‘levelling up’ goals, argues Professor Martin Jones, Deputy Vice-Chancellor at Staffordshire University.
Jonathan Baldwin, managing director of higher education at Jisc, reflects on a week that’s felt the force of people power – and says it’s time for university leaders to respond to students’ calls for change.
Alison Johns, Chief Executive of Advance HE, reviews another week in which higher education found itself in the spotlight, even when a royal funeral dominated the headlines.
Ross Renton, Pro Vice Chancellor Students, and Sophie Williams, Students' Union Chief Executive, both at the University of Worcester, consider the implications of the findings of a new survey on students' views on the Teaching Excellence Framework.
An informal consortium of students’ unions has produced what they are describing as the UK’s largest research project to date on students’ views of the Teaching Excellence Framework metrics. The report from Trendence UK gathers the views of almost 9,000 full-time undergraduate and post graduate students in 123 institutions. Notably there are no mentions of the more formal consortium, the National Union of Students or any work they may have carried out in this area.
For most universities there will be very few surprises in the outcomes of the research, particularly where there already exists a close relationship between the institution, students and Students’ Union. Within the University of Worcester, we carried out an exercise last year to gather the views of students and staff on what they think is excellent teaching, which helped to inform our own TEF submission.
Most of the students surveyed in this new research supported the idea of an exercise that encourages excellence in teaching . Perhaps this would also be the case if we asked this question of the public? Universities should seriously consider what they need to do in response to student’s belief identified in the study that the TEF should also consider IT and library resources. This could easily be captured in future versions of the TEF fromresource spend data or targeted questions within the NSS.
Outcomes, and specifically value for money, have been a key feature of the rhetoric surrounding the new higher education landscape from both the media and the Government. What they might find surprising is that employability - one of the few easily measurable outcomes - is at the bottom of the list of factors that demonstrate a university has excellent teaching. What is often missed is the value students place on having access to high quality staff. This study supports that opinion with staffing being the number one factor to measure quality, from students' point of view. We recognise this opinion from our own students at Worcester, where teaching and contact with teachers is what students expect and value most.
It is also interesting to see that students don’t consider retention and progression data as relevant as we might perhaps expect. This may be due to some students believing that this is also the responsibility of the individual to engage and participate rather than the just the University. Students are sometimes the ones who are most critical of their peers failing to engage, whilst staff attempt to retain students as much as possible.
To state the obvious, no one wants a Bronze TEF rating! Fundamentally, as much as no university wants a Bronze, students also don’t want to be at a Bronze institution. What many of us may not have predicted is that 11 per cent of students from an ethnic minority background say that they would have reconsidered applying to their university if it had been rated Gold. Why would a Gold rating put students off applying? It would be disastrous if such a large number of students were to be deterred either through self-doubt or concerns about the perceived culture of a ‘Gold’ institution. The Office for Students needs to seriously consider what can be done to prevent this potential issue by encouraging collaboration between institutions with initiatives such as the National Collaborative Outreach Programme.
The Government should be interested to learn that students have a more nuanced understanding of the relationship they have with their University. It is evident that ‘Value for Money’ is not the main focus of the relationship. The Government wanted the TEF to provide a ‘clear signal to students’ about ‘value for money andpotential employment outcomes’. This report signals that our students may have other priorities that need to be considered.
© 2013 Media FHE, all rights reserved