If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.
You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.
Interventionism is suddenly all the rage with the Westminster Conservative government, and higher education is feeling the impact as new policies and legislation are brought to bear on the sector, writes Johnny Rich, Chief Executive of Push and of the Engineering Professors’ Council.
Mike Boxall, an independent researcher and consultant on higher education policies and strategies, and a senior adviser to PA Consulting, considers the emerging post-COVID world and its implications for the future of universities. His blog is based on a paper published recently by PA Consulting, and co-authored with its HE lead, Ian Matthias.
The Westminster government should wake up to the full potential of higher education to help it meet its ‘levelling up’ goals, argues Professor Martin Jones, Deputy Vice-Chancellor at Staffordshire University.
The government has outlined how it intends the new Office for Students and UK Research and Innovation body working together amid concerns over their creation leading to a disconnect between teaching and research.
Fears have been raised across higher education that division of responsibilities between the two new bodies, as outlined in the Higher Education and Research Bill, could spell problems for work at the interface between teaching and research, such as the health of disciplines, awarding research degrees, post graduate training, shared facilities, knowledge exchange and skills development.
Concerns deepened in July when the higher education brief was split across the Department for Education (DfE) and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS).
A five page government factsheet aims to reassure the sector, spelling out seven areas where the OfS and UKRI (OfS) will be expected to co-operate.
The areas where the bodies will collaborate include skills, capability and progression, knowledge exchange, infrastructure funding, financial sustainability and efficiency of the HE system and providers, accountability and assurance, evidence gathering and system intelligence, the Teaching Excellence Framework and the Research Excellence Framework, the paper says.
In a move towards formal co-operation, each organisation will be required to develop a framework document with its partner department to ensure a consistent approach to joint working.
Cooperation and information sharing between the OfS and UKRI will include OfS revealing details of the financial stability of institutions to “ensure that UKRI has an accurate picture of institutional financial health so its funding decisions safeguard research sustainability”.
The fact sheet also highlights co-operation on postgraduate teaching, and reiterates that the REF will recognise and reward institutions who carry out applied teaching research, while the TEF will encourage teaching that is informed by research and professional practice.
Demands from various organisations, from the Russell Group to the Royal Society, for a clause which says “The OfS and UKRI may cooperate with one another in exercising any of their functions”, to be amended to “must cooperate”, have fallen on deaf ears, however.
Also rejected are calls for the creation of some kind of formal shared body, such as a sub-committee made up of members from each organisations.
Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute, commented: "The existence of the paper does in itself show how hard the new arrangements will be to operate successfully.
© 2013 Media FHE, all rights reserved