Login

close

Login

If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.


Unregistered Visitors

You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.

Find out more
Graduate earnings and HE admissions data mark another Groundhog Week in HE

Charlie Ball, Head of Higher Education Intelligence for Prospects at Jisc, reviews a week of higher education news which felt much like every other since lockdown, as new research on graduate earnings and university admissions was published.

Universities and students grapple with Covid and Brexit-related issues

Stephen Isherwood, chief executive of the Institute of Students Employers, reviews a week of HE news in which student accommodation, fee refunds, graduate jobs, and research funding surfaced as key issues.

Pandemic highlights gender inequality in HE

Reviewing a week in which issues affecting women’s lives were in the spotlight, Sandra Booth, Director of Policy and External Relations at the Council for Higher Education Art and Design (CHEAD), sees hopeful signs of moves to address gender equality in higher education.

Disadvantaged students and graduates need even more help in a pandemic

Commenting on a week of higher education news, Alice Gent, Policy, Research and Communications Intern, and Ruby Nightingale, Communications and Public Affairs Manager at the Sutton Trust, highlight evidence that Covid-19 is having a disproportionate impact on students and graduates from poorer backgrounds.

Fog starts to clear on road ahead for HE

Rachel Hewitt, Director of Policy and Advocacy for the Higher Education Policy Institute, sees signs of a clearer route out of the Covid crisis beginning to emerge for higher education.

Covid-19 funding squeeze must not jeopardise research excellence in modern universities

As plans unfold for the next Research Excellence Framework, positions are already being taken as to how to divide up the spoils in the form of the subsequent Research Excellence Grant (REG). Should this further favour the UK’s elite universities? Glasgow Caledonian University Principal and Vice-Chancellor Professor Pamela Gillies and GCU Yunus Chair and Pro Vice-Chancellor Research Professor Cam Donaldson offer a view from the other side of the tracks.

 

It is a pity that resource constraint and more general adversity often lead to ‘othering’ and division - reflected in societal trends such as islamophobia, anti-Semitism and, arguably, Brexit. Such trends also reflect the desires of significant proportions of populations to step back in time, thinking that things will be better: as opposed to the reality of halting social progress towards more prosperous, equal and representative societies. Coronavirus has raised expectations about a better world, but, for universities, resource constraint will continue, and perhaps get significantly worse, in a post Covid-19 world. 

How do such trends, and the potential adverse outcomes they engender, relate to the research environments of higher education institutions? It could be argued that, pre Covid-19, resource constraint led to calls to concentrate available research funding in our leading universities – the ‘jewels in the crown’. Here in Scotland, less-explicit calls were made for “larger HEIs with greater capacity to engage and coordinate innovation activities taking the lead” and for allocation of funds based on Research Excellence Framework (REF) performance to better recognise this.

With the Covid-19-induced delay in the REF, such debates are likely to be returned to and could continue along the lines of the Russell Group call to concentrate even more funding in large internationally-recognised institutions. The ‘everyday othering’ here is subtle and implicit, with no fingers pointed at ‘lesser’ institutions.

As othering tends to be harmful with respect to wider social trends, how might this be the case in university research-land? Whether explicit or implicit, othering of institutions such as ours - where we have important and impactful research in a smaller number of areas than the research-intensive universities - is potentially harmful in many ways (for a topical example of such impactful work, see this Lancet-published research on the effectiveness of handwashing against Covid-19). First, this outlook encourages wasteful fights over peanuts. Here at Glasgow Caledonian our 2019-20 Research Excellence Grant (REG) – distributed by funders based on previous REF performance -  amounts to £2.7 million per annum. The largest REG in Scotland is that of the University of Edinburgh, at £78 million per annum. So, in REG (as well as in many other) terms, not only does research concentration already exist, but also one has to question the evidence base for the marginal impact of taking away the small amounts of the REG allocated to modern universities and adding it to already-large amounts allocated to the research-intensives.

Secondly, there may even be a value-for-money case for such funds to be flowing in the other direction. In our case, three years ago, the REG allowed us to develop our research base around being the first university to adopt the Sustainable Development Goals as the operating framework for our research strategy. Among other things, this has allowed us to support six impactful research centres – including those in Climate Justice and our Yunus Centre for Social Business & Health - to pursue this agenda. This has attracted further funding to Scotland from UK Research & Innovation, the National Institute for Health Research and Wellcome Trust and contributed substantially to Glasgow Caledonian being ranked, for two consecutive years, in the top 50 worldwide in the recent Times Higher Education Social Impact Rankings. Further to our hosting of the first ever World Forum on Climate Justice in 2019, our REG funding has enabled us to take a leading role in hosting events in association with the forthcoming COP26 in Glasgow (now postponed until next year). Our Yunus Centre, too, has hosted two of the last four International Social Innovation Research Conferences in 2017 and 2019.

Helping universities produce ‘global citizens’

Third, resources supported by the REG allow us to leverage so much more in pursuit of a rounded education for our students - one that follows from our mission as the ‘University for the Common Good’. A research focus on social innovation in addressing the SDGs ties in well with our own particular approach to producing graduates who are ‘global citizens’. For example, through the work of our Glasgow School for Business & Society, our University became a PRME (Principles of Responsible Management Education) signatory in 2012, progressing now to being one of 30 PRME Global Champions and, in 2013, the first Scottish university to join the UN Global Compact. The Compact calls on companies to align with universal principles of human rights, fair employment, environmental sustainability and anti-corruption, whilst the corresponding mission of PRME is for business schools to transform management education, research and thought leadership in line with the SDGs.

This is further reflected in our accreditation as an AshokaU Changemaker Campus, bringing us into a network of around 50 like-minded universities worldwide, going beyond the curriculum to enhance access, mobility and student participation. Our research leadership in social innovation has enabled such important accreditations and has enhanced the student experience. No doubt other Modern Universities are in similar, and perhaps even stronger, positions to ours, following exactly the ‘pockets of excellence’ mantra that ‘big is not necessarily beautiful’, which funding authorities recognised in REF2014.

The ‘pockets of excellence’ notion extends to the successful ESRC-funded Scottish Graduate School of Social Science (SGSSS). Based on visionary and strong leadership from Edinburgh and Glasgow Universities, this initiative includes every university in Scotland, all of whom have benefited in one way or another from the array of funding schemes and other initiatives on offer. This is a good example of our final point, which is to ask whether we would be comfortable with even greater research concentration resulting in students attending those universities that are less well-off, and which, incidentally, have greater success in widening access, missing out on the research-based education that we can provide on the meagre resources that we are currently allocated.

We do not wish to be pushed into a position of ‘othering’ and would hope that, as in the case of SGSSS, all universities could come together and fight for more research resources for all. However, it does often feel, here in the Modern part of the sector, that the efforts we have made to support and develop our pockets of research excellence are under threat, which could lead to great harm, not only to the educational experience of our students but also to society more widely.

Back