If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.
You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.
Interventionism is suddenly all the rage with the Westminster Conservative government, and higher education is feeling the impact as new policies and legislation are brought to bear on the sector, writes Johnny Rich, Chief Executive of Push and of the Engineering Professors’ Council.
Mike Boxall, an independent researcher and consultant on higher education policies and strategies, and a senior adviser to PA Consulting, considers the emerging post-COVID world and its implications for the future of universities. His blog is based on a paper published recently by PA Consulting, and co-authored with its HE lead, Ian Matthias.
The Westminster government should wake up to the full potential of higher education to help it meet its ‘levelling up’ goals, argues Professor Martin Jones, Deputy Vice-Chancellor at Staffordshire University.
Jonathan Baldwin, managing director of higher education at Jisc, reflects on a week that’s felt the force of people power – and says it’s time for university leaders to respond to students’ calls for change.
There are signs in the past week’s higher education news of a bigger picture emerging from the apparent direction of government HE and FE policies, suggests Rhiannon Birch, Director of Planning and Insight at the University of Sheffield.
In a week when many in HE will have been grappling with the impact of UCU strike action and scenario planning for Covid-19, we also saw the launch of the OfS’ consultation on admissions as well as a flurry of policy analysis which suggests that more change is on the horizon.
While we wait for a response to the Augar Review it’s handy to have something to keep the sector occupied, and the “Consultation on the higher education admissions system in England”, launched on Thursday, doesn’t disappoint. With numerous reviews taking place over the last 20 years, there is a long history to draw on with the consultation rooted in the recurring themes of fairness and transparency, accurate data to help with decision-making and using admissions to enable widening participation agendas.
It’s fair to say that this is a comprehensive piece covering all the angles in a mighty 87 questions. The Independent has latched onto the potential for post-qualification admissions with enthusiasm as well as suggesting the end of unconditional offers and personal statements. Interestingly, while there is no direct mention of the marketisation of HE, there are some tantalising glimpses of a possible future in the section on Clearing (paragraph 127 to be precise). The suggestion that “entry to higher education becomes less of a ‘buyer’s market’” is particularly interesting in a week where there was also speculation about a return to Student Number Controls.
From a Planning perspective, the days of the Maximum Student Number (MaSN) and SNC are writ large in the collective memory. But would reintroducing a control on numbers going to university be so unexpected in the regulated market in which universities now operate? WonkHE provides a solid run round of the issues which may signal that an SNC is back on the policymaking cards, while the Telegraph features a piece arguing that we need more places in computer science, maths and engineering if the UK is to compete internationally. Combine this with a reminder from the Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson, that apprenticeship funding should be used to address wider skills needs rather than funding management qualifications for senior leaders and Claire Callendar’s HEPI blog on the decline of part time study, and a picture starts to emerge.
If you accept that there is a historical trajectory to be drawn from the warm fuzzy days of the University Grants Committee through the buffer body that was HEFCE to the sharper regulatory agenda of the OfS, then controlling student numbers and, potentially, course portfolio and admissions is a logical step for a government wishing to manage (or regulate) HE. Especially when the government’s view seems to be concentrating on the learning and teaching delivered by universities rather than research. Add some technical and skills-based provision via apprenticeships, work out the fit with further education and schools, keep some form of lifelong learning and you could be argued to be moving to embracing HE as part of a wider education system. With the separation of the science brief and suggestion that the Universities Minister in the DfE could also look after FE, it all starts to look very consistent, which is unusual in an environment where piecemeal is the preferred approach to policy development.
Change in higher education feels continual and often disconnected, but this week’s news suggests that several different policy agendas are beginning to become interwoven. To end on a positive note, Vincenzo Raimo advises that there is a lot to be learned from the ethos of start-up companies and that some of this agility and drive could address embedded ways of university thinking, enable change and create different ways to respond to current challenges. Maybe the way forward is actually to respond differently!
© 2013 Media FHE, all rights reserved