Login

close

Login

If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.


Unregistered Visitors

You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.

Find out more
Conceptions of what is excellent in higher education are starting to change

Professor Edward Peck, Vice-Chancellor of Nottingham Trent University, outlines strategies adopted by NTU that are boosting social mobility and which helped it win the inaugural Guardian University of the Year award, a gong he believes shows how notions of excellence in HE are changing.

A house divided? Growing divisions and inequalities in HE

Mike Boxall, who has thirty years' experience as a consultant and commentator on strategic developments in higher and further education, finds evidence in recent news of growing and worrying divisions within UK higher education.

UK HE must put its house in order to maintain global excellence

News on higher education over the past week highlights an urgent need for the sector to get to grips with ethical issues that have a bearing on the way it is managed and governed, argues Sandra Booth, Director of Policy and External Relations at Council for Higher Education in Art and Design (CHEAD).

Rising staff costs putting universities under greater pressure, warns Moody's

UK universities will face greater financial pressure over the next three years due to rising staff costs as they accommodate more students, retain talent and negotiate pay rises,  Moody's has warned.

Women researchers report gender bias in rewards and promotion

Female researchers are being rewarded less than their male peers and passed over for promotion, a new survey has revealed.

Key findings from the 2015 Careers in Research Online Survey (CROS) carried out by Vitae, the careers membership organisation, show a significant minority of women researchers perceived bias in the way they were treated.

A fifth of female researchers disagreed that there was fair treatment irrespective of gender, up from 18 per cent in 2013.

The perception of unfair treatment increased over time. Nearly a third (30 per cent) of respondents who had been research staff for more than 10 years disagreed that career progression was fair, compared to just 14 per cent who had been in the job for less than two years.

A total of 72 UK higher education institutions participated in CROS 2015, with 8,964 research staff responding.

It showed a slight decrease in the proportion of research staff employed on fixed-term contracts, but these still formed the majority (74%). The figure was considerably higher for research staff in their first position in the institution (over 90%). There was evidence to suggest a slight decrease in the use of very short contracts since 2013.

A higher percentage of female research staff were on fixed term contracts compared to males, which was not explained by disciplinary differences, age, length of experience or mode of employment.

Vitae recommended that universities undertake detailed scrutiny of their data to identify any perceptions of discrimination and unjustified inequalities between different types of research staff and with other staff.

In general, most research staff felt positive about their work/life balance, integration and recognition by their institution for their research activity.

Staff who had been on multiple short-term contracts over a long period at the same institution tended to feel less valued and have less positive feelings about their employer, job and career.

The use of staff appraisals had increased slightly, with just over two thirds reporting they had received them. Just over 60 per cent said they found them useful.

A high proportion of research staff – two thirds - continue to aspire to a career in higher education. However, the report noted that this proportion was “probably higher” than would be possible in the UK.

“Overall, this seems to suggest that many research staff do not have realistic expectations of their long term career prospects and have little knowledge of or value careers in other employment sectors,” it said.

Vitae also published its Principal Investigators and Research Leaders Survey (PIRLS), covering 55 institutions and 4316 research leaders. It found that, overall, leadership and management activities were viewed as less important than research leaders’ core personal research activity and it was in this area that they felt they gained most recognition from the institution.

Senior researchers felt lower levels of confidence when it came to the performance management of research staff, managing budgets and finances, and providing careers advice to research staff. In these areas, only around a quarter of research leaders were fully confident.

Training or continuing professional development activity was marginally higher than in 2013, although a third of respondents had undertaken one day or less in the past year and less than half more than two days.

 

 

 

wavebreakmediamicro / 123RF
Back