Login

close

Login

If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.


Unregistered Visitors

You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.

Find out more
HEi-know Weekly HE News Review: Diversity matters

Mike Ratcliffe, Academic Registrar at Nottingham Trent University, reviews HE sector news in a week when T levels, educational “snobbery”, Oxbridge admissions, and a new universities minister made the headlines.

MPs urge the government to break down barriers to nursing degree apprenticeships

Nursing degree apprenticeships as a successful and sustainable route into the profession will forever be a mirage unless barriers to delivery are torn down, MPs have warned.

UUK roundtable to consider flagging students' mental health problems to parents

Universities UK is bringing together university leaders, mental health experts, and students and parents to consider when a nominated family member or another appropriately identified person might be contacted if a student is suffering with poor mental health or in acute distress.

Graduate earnings probed, unconditional offers questioned, a business levy proposed, and a minister resigned … another news-packed week in HE

Professor Mark Smith, Vice-Chancellor of Lancaster University, and Nicola Owen, Lancaster’s Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary, kick off a new series of HEi-know weekly higher education news reviews, highlighting and commenting on some of the most significant and interesting HE stories and opinions of the past week.

Universities still making false marketing claims, says Which?

A number of universities are presenting unverifiable marketing claims making it difficult for prospective students to make informed choices, according to a new Which? University investigation.

Almost a year after the advertising watchdog upheld a number of complaints about  misleading information in higher education, the consumer champion found several universities are making unverifiable and potentially misleading claims.

Which? University carried out a review of comparative claims made by UK institutions and found that at least six universities included examples of unsubstantiated or unverifiable claims about their standing on their websites, in likely breach of advertising standards.

The review found a number of unjustified claims, which were not clearly verifiable including:

  • Edinburgh's Heriot-Watt University described itself as, "one of the world's leading universities for pioneering research informed by the needs of business and industry." This claim was not supported by accessible facts or figures on the website and Heriot-Watt University is ranked 351st-400th out of 1,103 institutions in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2018. Following a letter from Which? University, Heriot-Watt explained that its links with business support its claim, which it stands by.
  • Aston University explained that it was, "ranked within the top 35 universities in all university ranking tables." However, there was no information included to substantiate the claim. Aston explained to us that this statement referred to employability metrics rather than its overall ranking position. It agreed this was ambiguous and has removed the claim from its website.
  • University of Aberdeen claimed to be, "ranked consistently among the world's top universities," but did not verify this claim on its website. The University has told us that it will enhance its website to provide clearer qualification regards supporting information.
  • Newcastle University included a Key Facts document on its website that stated it was in the top 1% in the QS World University Rankings. It came 141st in the current table, putting it in the top 15% of ranked institutions. Following a letter from Which? University, Newcastle has removed this from its website.
  • Ulster University stated that it "is in the top 3% of universities in the world" when it came 501-600th out of in the 1,103 Times Higher Education World University Rankings in 2018, putting them in the mid-tier of those rankings. Ulster University did not respond when Which? University got in contact to flag its concerns.
  • University of the West of Scotland claimed that it "ranked in the Top 3% of Universities Worldwide" in its Google search descriptor. Which? University does not believe that this claim was sufficiently transparent or verifiable. UWS also came 501-600th out of 1,103 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2018. University of the West of Scotland responded to explain that where comparative claims are made on its website it always ensures that it has sufficient data to back up any claim and makes the basis of the claim clear.

Which? University said it was particularly concerned about these comparative claims, given it is less than one year since the Advertising Standards Authority issued its comprehensive advice in November 2017 to universities about such claims and its rulings which upheld complaints about comparative claims made in university advertising. Where universities are making comparative claims about their relative performance, these should be verifiable and provided with sufficient qualifying information to ensure that prospective students are not misled.

Alex Hayman, Managing Director of Which? University, said:

"It is critical that prospective students can trust the facts that higher education institutions are putting forward. However, we've found numerous examples of universities falling short. We want universities to act responsibly in line with the ASA's guidelines as thousands across the country prepare to apply for the next step of their education in the coming weeks and months."

Back