Login

close

Login

If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.


Unregistered Visitors

You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.

Find out more
Study finds progress on tackling hate crime and sexual harassment on campus

Universities awarded funding as part of a large-scale programme to tackle hate crime and sexual harassment on campus have made good progress, an evaluation of the scheme has concluded.

Hinds urges OfS to take “ambitious” measures to protect HE standards

Education Secretary Damian Hinds has urged the Office for Students to adopt “ambitious” new measures “in order to tackle risks to the world class quality of higher education” in the UK.

"Open border" universities perform best in new U-Multirank rankings

The most internationally engaged "open border" universities perform best in the quality of their education, research impact, and knowledge transfer, according to U-Multirank, which has published its latest set of global rankings.

Augar proposals must not mean supporting FE at the expense of HE

The Augar review panel was right to highlight under-funding of further education, but addressing this should not mean cuts in the higher education budget, argues Dr Joe Marshall, Chief Executive Officer of the National Centre for Universities and Business (NCUB).

Three HE leaders' first thoughts on Augar

As the sector begins to respond to the report from the post-18 education and funding review panel headed by Philip Augar, HEi-know asked three HE leaders for their initial impressions. Sir Peter Scott, professor of higher education studies at UCL's Institute of Education and former Vice-Chancellor of Kingston University; Dr Rhiannon Birch, head of planning and research at Sheffield University; and Professor Liz Barnes, Vice-Chancellor of Staffordshire University all offered their thoughts.

HEi-think: Room for constructively critical students on OfS panel

Nicola Dandridge, chief executive of the Office for Students, outlines her vision for engaging with students and ensuring effective student representation on the OfS.

 

When it was first announced that I had been appointed Chief Executive of the Office for Students (OfS) Amatey Doku, the NUS' vice president for higher education, tweeted that he looked forward to working with me "to ensure that the OfS is in fact an office for students". I really liked the edge to this tweet: and it was a fair challenge. So it was a pleasure to sit down with him - and NUS members from across the country - as I set out my thoughts on how the OfS might best seek to engage with students.

To succeed, the OfS needs to have a demonstrably positive impact on students' lives in the short, medium and longer term. Everything we do must be rooted in the student interest. In order to achieve this, my starting position is that students must be meaningfully, seriously and honestly engaged in what we do and how we do it.

The NUS has a crucial role to play here. I'm looking forward to meeting with Shakira Martin, the NUS President, to discuss how we can best work together in the student interest. 

We know that the OfS' Board will be boosted by a member with a specific student representative role. This Board member will be appointed in the coming weeks, and one of their most important roles will be to chair a new Student Panel, which will bring together a group of around ten students to advise the OfS's Board.

I want the panel to feed into the set-up of the OfS, so we will be moving quickly to put a process in place for recruitment. Once we are formally established, I see the panel as have a critical role - helping ensure that we are able to engage properly with all students - including those who, for a variety of reasons, may be harder to
reach. The panel will identify and oversee some specific research, which they will define, but we will fund. We will also ask them to think ahead to how students and their priorities might be different ten years or more from now.

These are exciting roles for important times, and I am sure we will be able to appoint an excellent panel which reflects the diverse nature of higher education provision in England. I was asked in my meeting with NUS if there was room on the panel for students who might be sceptical about various aspects of higher education policy. My answer? Emphatically, yes. Of course we'll need the panel to engage constructively with us, but we should never shy away from debate, or reject out of hand views which do not mirror our own. Constructive challenge will be one of the panel's key roles: to coin a phrase from the OfS Chair, Michael Barber, we should be 'plain-speaking'
and happy to engage in a robust and honest dialogue.

We have an unparalleled opportunity to make a significant difference to students' experience and outcomes. We have been given extensive powers to act in students' interests. We want to work with them to seize the opportunity we have, so as to ensure that the OfS is indeed an Office for Students.

Back