If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.
You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.
The future is digital – but how can HEIs best embrace technology to benefit staff and students? Phil Richards, chief innovation officer at Jisc, outlines key ideas and suggestions that emerged from the organisation’s Digifest event.
Data and learning analytics are like "gold dust" in higher education, and the sector cannot afford to put advances in this area on pause, argues Graham Cooper, Head of Education at Capita Education Software Solutions.
The use of big data to improve the student experience is a rich seam that universities are increasingly mining. In this Good Practice Briefing, HEi-know looks at a variety of approaches that have been taken by eight universities to collect and make use of data to enhance learning, and provide better support and feedback for students.
Dave Hall, Registrar and Chief Operating Officer at the University of Leicester, finds the long-running argument over whether higher education's primary purpose is utilitarian or more holistic continues to dominate debate in the media on developments in the sector.
The Royal Statistical Society has warned that the Teaching Excellence Framework is misleading thousands of students by failing to meet the standards of trustworthiness, quality and value that the public might expect.
Mike Ratcliffe, Oxford-based university administrator and Director of More Means Better, examines the latest UCAS data, and finds competition for mobile students is on the rise.
The end-of-cycle data from UCAS are a very useful set of information, despite being focused on only full-time undergraduates in the main UCAS cycle, and the fact that a large proportion of Scottish students do not enter higher education via UCAS.
The statistical release caught the attention of the media las week as it contains both demographic data for the whole sector and some institutional data. The most prominent story was that Oxford admitted more 18 year old females (1,070) than males (1,025), although across all ages a fraction more males (1,660) were accepted than females (1,635). I’m not saying that it’s not important how Oxford allocates its places, but the ten year run of data shows that its 3,295 acceptances through UCAS is only 40 higher than in 2008. Oxford is not growing (neither is Cambridge - its 3,480 acceptances are 45 fewer than in 2008).
Aside from Oxbridge, and surely more interesting, are both the short-term and long-term changes in student numbers. Universities whose acceptances have risen by more than 10 per cent in 2017 over 2016 include some pretty hefty number changes in the course of one year.
University of Leeds
Liverpool John Moores University
University of Reading
University of the West of Scotland
Glasgow Caledonian University
Brunel University London
University of Stirling
York St John University
Birkbeck, University of London
Arts University Bournemouth
As there hasn’t been that much growth in the sector, there are places with fewer acceptances this year than last, including Middlesex with over 1,000 fewer, London Metropolitan 700 down and changes in Scotland with Aberdeen down nearly 900 and Napier with 450 fewer. Remember, UCAS does not handle all students, so these falls may not represent such large falls in the overall student population.
This is, of course, is the market that ministers wanted. The difficulty is that it’s not hard to make the assumption that this market is working for the mobile student. Students who are well-prepared for study and who are able to relocate are highly attractive and there are incentives on offer for them through the admissions process.
Previous data releases have shown that the average entry tariff fell for both growing and shrinking universities - suggesting that the mid-tariff institutions were taking the better prepared students from the low-tariff universities. This data release from UCAS does not include tariff or widening participation (WP) data, but does have a split between students with A level or other qualifications. It does look as if the number of A level students falls faster in shrinking universities than those with other qualifications (but the ‘other’ category doesn’t necessarily equate with less mobile or WP students). What we have seen previously is that the number of WP students at growing universities has remained static so that their proportion of the total population has declined.
When the student number cap was first relaxed, there were incentives for universities to attract AAB+ students. It is clear that universities are still incentivised to attract the best prepared students they can: there are intrinsic rewards, but they are also reflected in league tables and positioning towards TEF and future accountability measures that might be run by the Office for Students. Many universities have kept ‘excellence scholarships’ in place to recruit and retain the best prepared students.
The advantage of 10 years of data is that you can see longer trends away from the blips of individual years, particularly notable around 2012. As an example, if you took at the three years before the fee rise (2008, 2009 and 2010) and compare that with the last three years (2015, 2016, and 2017) some universities have significantly changed their numbers. Kingston averaged 7,500 acceptances a year before fees, now it averages just over 5,000. Large drops can be seen at UEL, Plymouth and Southampton Solent. Some universities, such as Bedfordshire and London Metropolitan are also ‘re-sizing’, but their peak in terms of acceptances came in 2011. Whereas Kings College London, UCL, Bristol, Exeter, Sussex and Liverpool are all now accepting over 1,500 more students a year on average than they were before the change.
This isn’t necessary just the whole story: the university with the biggest change in the number of acceptances is Coventry with its multiple campuses. The limits of the UCAS data means that it cannot tell us the whole story of alternative providers, but BIMM, who only came into the system in 2013, had over 2,500 acceptances in 2017 (more than Aberdeen, Bangor or Bradford).
In England, the OfS has a duty to promote choice for students and encourage competition between providers. Looking at these UCAS data, it looks like it’s got a head start from the 2012 reforms…
© 2013 Media FHE, all rights reserved