If you are a registered HEi-know user, please log in to continue.
You must be a registered HEi-know user to access Briefing Reports, stories and other information and services. Please click on the link below to find out more about HEi-know.
Universities awarded funding as part of a large-scale programme to tackle hate crime and sexual harassment on campus have made good progress, an evaluation of the scheme has concluded.
Education Secretary Damian Hinds has urged the Office for Students to adopt “ambitious” new measures “in order to tackle risks to the world class quality of higher education” in the UK.
The most internationally engaged "open border" universities perform best in the quality of their education, research impact, and knowledge transfer, according to U-Multirank, which has published its latest set of global rankings.
The Augar review panel was right to highlight under-funding of further education, but addressing this should not mean cuts in the higher education budget, argues Dr Joe Marshall, Chief Executive Officer of the National Centre for Universities and Business (NCUB).
As the sector begins to respond to the report from the post-18 education and funding review panel headed by Philip Augar, HEi-know asked three HE leaders for their initial impressions. Sir Peter Scott, professor of higher education studies at UCL's Institute of Education and former Vice-Chancellor of Kingston University; Dr Rhiannon Birch, head of planning and research at Sheffield University; and Professor Liz Barnes, Vice-Chancellor of Staffordshire University all offered their thoughts.
Professor Craig Mahoney, Principal and Vice-Chancellor of University of West of Scotland, considers the potential damage Home Secretary Amber Rudd’s proposed student visa restrictions could cause the higher education sector.
On Tuesday (4 October 2016), the Home Secretary said the Government intends to consult universities on proposed new restrictions on overseas students. I sincerely hope this will be a genuine listening exercise because her announcement has some very serious implications for the Higher Education sector across the UK.
Overseas students make an outstanding contribution economically, socially and culturally to the UK. Universities UK say that non-EU students contribute £7 billion to the UK economy, generating almost 137,000 jobs in communities in every region of the UK.
International staff make a vital contribution to our universities and country. The UK has one of the strongest university systems in the world and is in a prime position to build on this and boost the country’s export earnings.
Any suggestion that only so-called ‘good’ courses or universities should be the focus of growth is confusing and requires clarification. Every single university in the UK is externally validated, so the quality of the product is not in doubt. Quality should also be judged on the impact the course has on the student’s life, or the benefit to the university’s local community.
Here at UWS, internationalisation is a major priority for us, as is attracting overseas students. Why then should our aspirations to be a major international player in higher education be restricted? You can’t ask universities to be entrepreneurial and then restrict their ability to attract students, particularly when all the stringent verifications for students attending these institutions are already in place.
Attracting international students brings expertise, non-State-funds and disposable income to regional economies throughout the UK. We risk putting all of that in jeopardy. There is also a strong cultural case to be made for overseas students, in that they enhance our communities and give other students an international insight they wouldn’t necessarily be exposed to.
Researchers from around the globe are attracted to UK universities because they do world-leading research. That affects universities’ ratings in a positive sense and is why the UK has so many universities in the world top rankings. The irony here is that ‘British workers for British jobs’ puts our status as a world leader in higher education under threat.
In addition, I would challenge strongly the Home Secretary’s comments that foreign students do not have to be proficient in English. English language proficiency for all university tier 4 students coming to the UK is a clear requirement and this is also a significant factor in visa applications.
I would urge the Government to think very carefully about the route they have embarked on because it risks causing severe and lasting damage to the higher education sector and the wider UK economy. Overseas students should not feature in the immigration totals – it is completely the wrong approach.
Here at UWS, we will make the strongest possible representations as an institution and work with our partner institutions and through Universities UK and Universities Scotland to persuade the Government to alter its course.
© 2013 Media FHE, all rights reserved